Difference between revisions of "QMS"
From GWAVA Technologies Training
(It's funny goodluck <a href=" http://www.acfl.nl/index.php?option=safe-direct-payday-lenders-only-no-third-party#discussed ">installment loans like western sky</a> Asiana Airlines Inc's chief executi) |
(Will I get paid for overtime? <a href=" http://pabug.org/cash-advance-warren-ri/#information ">payday loans for people on benefits with bad credit</a> National League sources say the Phillies are ame) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | I'd like , please <a href=" http://www.acfl.nl/index.php?option=best-loan-rate#miserable ">online only cash advance</a> The voters in California amended the state constitution by referendum legally, to define a legitimate government policy regarding the recognition of marriage. | + | I'd like , please <a href=" http://www.acfl.nl/index.php?option=best-loan-rate#miserable ">online only cash advance</a> The voters in California amended the state constitution by referendum legally, to define a legitimate government policy regarding the recognition of marriage.ÃÂ The court is making the case that this is a matter for California to settle, not the federal courts, and there is a very good case to make there.ÃÂ However, the effect of this is to overturn an election whose legality was never in doubt just because some people didn't like the outcome.ÃÂ That to me is a more dangerous outcome than a precedent-setting decision on standing. |
Revision as of 20:18, 29 April 2015
I'd like , please <a href=" http://www.acfl.nl/index.php?option=best-loan-rate#miserable ">online only cash advance</a> The voters in California amended the state constitution by referendum legally, to define a legitimate government policy regarding the recognition of marriage.ÃÂ The court is making the case that this is a matter for California to settle, not the federal courts, and there is a very good case to make there.ÃÂ However, the effect of this is to overturn an election whose legality was never in doubt just because some people didn't like the outcome.ÃÂ That to me is a more dangerous outcome than a precedent-setting decision on standing.
