Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"
(A law firm <a href=" http://www.bergbaustahl.at/index.php/where-to-get-doxycycline.pptx ">doxycycline hyclate 100mg for chlamydia</a> The Libyan expert expressed fears the growing influence ofthe Mus) |
(How do I get an outside line? <a href=" http://www.slowreview.com/index.php/buy-neurontin-haef#bookshelf ">buy neurontin lnrm</a> You'd be right if you said "micro scale" but it is definitely measura) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | How do I get an outside line? <a href=" http://www.slowreview.com/index.php/buy-neurontin-haef#bookshelf ">buy neurontin lnrm</a> You'd be right if you said "micro scale" but it is definitely measurable (in approximations, not exact) on a macro scale. By taking a sample of relatively otherwise equal factors, we can determine which is random, and thus what is luck. E.g. if I measure a coin flip for 100 flips and see that they are equal heads and tails, then I can know that your prediction of getting heads correctly on the 101th flip is likely due to luck. (And yes, I can't be positively sure, it could be some other factor I am missing, and that's why the tests would be repeated by other independent experiments to filter out things like that). Science IS a science. | |
| + | <a href=" http://www.megliopossibile.com/buy-prozac-xpal ">buy prozac edrt</a> To try to reduce those factors, the researchers did a second experiment with scripted videos they recorded. They made sure the 42 students saw videos expressing opinions they disagreed with. And the participants were asked to focus either on the speakers' eyes or speakers' mouths. | ||
Revision as of 11:57, 29 September 2015
How do I get an outside line? <a href=" http://www.slowreview.com/index.php/buy-neurontin-haef#bookshelf ">buy neurontin lnrm</a> You'd be right if you said "micro scale" but it is definitely measurable (in approximations, not exact) on a macro scale. By taking a sample of relatively otherwise equal factors, we can determine which is random, and thus what is luck. E.g. if I measure a coin flip for 100 flips and see that they are equal heads and tails, then I can know that your prediction of getting heads correctly on the 101th flip is likely due to luck. (And yes, I can't be positively sure, it could be some other factor I am missing, and that's why the tests would be repeated by other independent experiments to filter out things like that). Science IS a science.
<a href=" http://www.megliopossibile.com/buy-prozac-xpal ">buy prozac edrt</a> To try to reduce those factors, the researchers did a second experiment with scripted videos they recorded. They made sure the 42 students saw videos expressing opinions they disagreed with. And the participants were asked to focus either on the speakers' eyes or speakers' mouths.
