Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"

From GWAVA Technologies Training
Jump to: navigation, search
(I'm on holiday <a href=" http://www.emilyballatseawhite.co.uk/price-of-manforce-dotted-condom.pdf ">manforce condom use.com</a> This route was laid without any level crossings to the Berne loading ga)
(Can I take your number? <a href=" http://thefratellis.com/site/prosolution-tablete-forum.pdf#portable ">prosolutions online training</a> Olling provided other comparisons between the MSC and Berglund)
Line 1: Line 1:
I'm on holiday <a href=" http://www.emilyballatseawhite.co.uk/price-of-manforce-dotted-condom.pdf ">manforce condom use.com</a>  This route was laid without any level crossings to the Berne loading gauge, so it can already accommodate trains from the continent. The track bed is still largely in existence and crying out to be relaid. Some diversions would be required but the cost would be minimal compared with HS2.
+
Can I take your number? <a href=" http://thefratellis.com/site/prosolution-tablete-forum.pdf#portable ">prosolutions online training</a>  Olling provided other comparisons between the MSC and Berglund designs. The Berglund design&#8217;s living areas &#8211; the six cylindrical segments that would together form its torus &#8211; had a total of 33,000 cubic feet of volume, or about 2000 cubic feet less than the MSC design. It had a floor area of 2900 square feet, or about 850 square feet less than the MSC design. The exterior surface area of the Berglund design&#8217;s living modules would total 13,000 square feet, or about 3400 square feet more than the MSC design; this meant that Berglund&#8217;s station would provide a larger target for marauding meteroids. Compared with the Berglund design, the Project Olympus station design&#8217;s zero-gee hub was enormous: 15,000 cubic feet versus just 2500 cubic feet for Berglund&#8217;s station.

Revision as of 17:54, 15 August 2015

Can I take your number? <a href=" http://thefratellis.com/site/prosolution-tablete-forum.pdf#portable ">prosolutions online training</a> Olling provided other comparisons between the MSC and Berglund designs. The Berglund design’s living areas – the six cylindrical segments that would together form its torus – had a total of 33,000 cubic feet of volume, or about 2000 cubic feet less than the MSC design. It had a floor area of 2900 square feet, or about 850 square feet less than the MSC design. The exterior surface area of the Berglund design’s living modules would total 13,000 square feet, or about 3400 square feet more than the MSC design; this meant that Berglund’s station would provide a larger target for marauding meteroids. Compared with the Berglund design, the Project Olympus station design’s zero-gee hub was enormous: 15,000 cubic feet versus just 2500 cubic feet for Berglund’s station.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Home
Exchange
GroupWise
JAVA
Linux
MTK
Retain
GW Monitoring and Reporting (Redline)
GW Disaster Recovery (Reload)
GW Forensics (Reveal)
GWAVA
Secure Messaging Gateway
GW Mailbox Management (Vertigo)
Windows
Other
User Experience
Toolbox
Languages
Toolbox