Difference between revisions of "QMS"
From GWAVA Technologies Training
(Where's the postbox? <a href=" http://www.cygnetmarquees.com/revatio-kontraindikation.pdf#unemployed ">revatio warnings</a> "There was an honest discussion about how both governments could be product) |
(I can't get a dialling tone <a href=" http://cymhin.offordcentre.com/proextender-kuala-lumpur.pdf#overflow ">proextender hurts</a> If both sets of points in fact describe the same object, then they c) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | I can't get a dialling tone <a href=" http://cymhin.offordcentre.com/proextender-kuala-lumpur.pdf#overflow ">proextender hurts</a> If both sets of points in fact describe the same object, then they can be aligned by rotating one of them around the right axis. For any given pair of points â one from the model and one from the object â itâs possible to calculate the probability that rotating one point by a particular angle around a particular axis will align it with the other. The problem is that the same rotation might move other pairs of points farther away from each other. | |
Revision as of 01:50, 15 August 2015
I can't get a dialling tone <a href=" http://cymhin.offordcentre.com/proextender-kuala-lumpur.pdf#overflow ">proextender hurts</a> If both sets of points in fact describe the same object, then they can be aligned by rotating one of them around the right axis. For any given pair of points â one from the model and one from the object â itâs possible to calculate the probability that rotating one point by a particular angle around a particular axis will align it with the other. The problem is that the same rotation might move other pairs of points farther away from each other.
