Difference between revisions of "User talk:Danielc"

Latest revision as of 23:59, 24 November 2015

I am my own person.

If it's relevant you may not find it here.

Revision as of 17:06, 2 November 2015 (view source) 188.143.232.21 (Talk) (Could you please repeat that? <a href=" http://jobsinoxford.ca/index.php/igt-stinkin-rich-slot-machine#conversation ">well of fortune slot machines</a> "This is among the hardest planets to explain i) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 23:59, 24 November 2015 (view source) Danielc (Talk \| contribs)
(14,998 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~Could~~ you please repeat that? <a href=" http://jobsinoxford.ca/index.php/igt-stinkin-rich-slot-machine#conversation ">well of fortune slot machines</a> "This is among the hardest planets to explain in a traditional planet-formation framework," study researcher Markus Janson, a Hubble postdoctoral fellow at Princeton University in New Jersey, said in a statement. "Its discovery implies that we need to seriously consider alternative formation theories, or perhaps to reassess some of the basic assumptions in the core-accretion theory."	+	I am my own person.
		+
		+	If it's relevant you may not find it here.