Difference between revisions of "User talk:Danielc"

Latest revision as of 23:59, 24 November 2015

I am my own person.

If it's relevant you may not find it here.

Revision as of 11:39, 30 October 2015 (view source) 188.143.232.15 (Talk) (I'm at Liverpool University <a href=" http://www.sevillaclick.com/discount-pharmacy-browns-plains.pptx ">mail order pharmacy dilaudid</a> The truth is that little girls really do enjoy science and bu) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 23:59, 24 November 2015 (view source) Danielc (Talk \| contribs)
(17,404 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	I'm at Liverpool University <a href=" http://www.sevillaclick.com/discount-pharmacy-browns-plains.pptx ">mail order pharmacy dilaudid</a> The truth is that little girls really do enjoy science and building toys if given the opportunity. They just need to be shown that these toys are for them, too. If the "boys club" is opened to them, they are eager and enthusiastic about participating. Once Lego figured this out, the new line of Lego Friends marketed at girls took off. I hear grumbling that the line is too overtly feminine with its pink and purple bricks -- but isn't that exactly the point? Why can't something be feminine and still be a science and building toy? Otherwise we just perpetuate the social norm that "feminine" and "scientific" don't mix. Mattel finally came around as well; today Barbie is not ~~only a ballerina but also a computer engineer and an architect~~.	+	I am my own person.
		+
		+	If it's relevant you may not find it here.